|Photo credit: ©istockphoto.com/monkeybusinessimages|
When I went to work for a rep in 1970, my apprenticeship consisted of reading product catalogs and any old books I could find, listening to old men tell stories, prowling any basement I could get into and cringing as psychotic wholesalers from Brooklyn and the Bronx screamed at me over the phone because something got backordered. I got by, but just barely.
I wasn’t in any union — I mention that because most apprenticeships seem to come though the unions. The Wall Street Journal had an article about this recently and it caught my eye because it began on such a positive note.
The writer quoted Robert Lerman, an economics professor at American University, who said, “Apprenticeships can offer a precise match between the skills employers want and the training workers receive.” And isn’t that the spirit of the whole thing? Let’s teach people the skills they need to meet the demands of the market while following a path toward a great career.
It also mentioned John Ladd, director of the Department of Labor’s Office of Apprenticeship (did you know there was such an office?), who said, “It’s a great model for transferring skills from one generation to the next.” I like that even more because I learned a lot from old people. Part of the apprentice’s job is to shut up and listen, right?
But then the article went on to say that formal programs, those that combine on-the-job learning with mentorships and classroom education, fell 40% in the United States between 2003 and 2013. Doesn’t that make you wonder? How could something that makes so much sense and is so steeped in history suddenly decline by nearly half?
Lerman speculates in the article that the reason could be because two-thirds of the apprenticeships in the United States are in the construction industry, fortifying the blue-collar aspects of being an apprentice, which turns off lots of young people. Perhaps they’d rather be texting, tweeting and posting to Facebook rather than building stuff. Or maybe it’s because, for years, the only way into a union apprenticeship program was to have a relative already in the union who would put in a good word for you.
And then, the author of the article goes on to note, there are U.S. companies that could be creating more apprenticeships if apprenticeships weren’t so closely associated with unions. Hey, no need to be organizing the kids, right? They’re liable to grow up and demand more. Whoa.
The article mentions that President Obama set aside $100 million for apprenticeships, but these apprenticeships had to be in high-growth industries such as health care, information technology and supply-chain management. There’s nothing about the work we do in there and that makes me think about how many too cold, too hot, unwashed and probably very ill Americans there may be work for in a few decades if dopey people instead of well-taught people are running this industry.
The article also states: “Apprenticeships now exist for computer professionals and for certified nursing assistants in South Carolina, where the number of businesses offering apprenticeships has grown to 647 from 90 in 2007. Some 4,700 people who trained in South Carolina’s apprentice program are now fully employed.”
I figure all those office buildings with the computer-trained people and all those nursing homes filled with saggy Southerners are going to need HVAC in the days to come, right? But who will be doing that work if we don’t have enough apprentices learning the right way now?
Wisconsin currently has 8,000 apprenticeship programs and they want to add even more but these will be for truck drivers and the high-level manufacturing industry. That’s great but I’m thinking about how cold it gets in Wisconsin. Who’s going to work on all those heating systems?
An outsider’s opinion
I ran all these thoughts by Carsten Nørgaard, who lives in Ebeltoft, Denmark, and is very sharp. I asked him because he doesn’t live in the United States. Listen to what he has to say. Oh, and this may sting a bit:
“I believe you Americans in this area can learn a lot from countries like Germany and my country, Denmark, where apprenticeships have been used for many years. It is the way to become a plumber, carpenter, bricklayer or electrician. It typically takes 4 to 4 1/2 years to become a professional craftsman in Denmark. I am not sure about Germany.
“Not to upset any Americans, but from my experience — I lived 4 1/2 years in the United States — many craftsmen have limited skills. They can put things together but many do not know basic things about insulation and construction. I have seen many houses being built and I have often wondered how people can accept the quality handed to them. It seems to me that the up-front appearance is more important than the detailed quality to most buyers. Maybe I am wrong as I have mostly seen single-family home construction and not large construction, so I will say sorry right away.
“I have an education. It is not a ‘training’ as you often hear of in the United States. As an electrician, I studied for 4 1/2 years, where some sections were in a classroom and laboratory education at an academy. Other sections were with fieldwork at a company where a person would typically work closely with an experienced craftsman. After the 4 1/2 years, a person can build an engineering or architectural education on top of that.
“Today, you can become an engineer without first being a professional craftsman. In my younger days, it was normal for a person to become a craftsman and then add another education on top. Many companies like people with both educations, as it gives the person a broader view and a better understanding of a problem.
“After the 4 1/2 years when you have finished your apprenticeship period, you will have to pass an examination that includes both an academic test in writing and a practical test, where you must make an installation within your trade. You will be questioned verbally in this test. So both the answers, as well as the quality of your work, count in this second test. After passing these two tests, you can call yourself a plumber or an electrician or whatever trade title you have chosen.
“In Denmark over the last few years, there have been problems with the perception of the craftsman education. Young people have seen the apprenticeship as dated and not as ‘fine’ as moving from high school to college. The government, together with the technical academies, is now putting effort into changing this perception and it once again is slowly moving toward being OK to become a well-educated craftsman.
“It is strange; no one can live without a plumber or electrician, though a banker or someone who researches antiquities seems to be more ‘valuable.’”
And isn’t that the truth? Maybe the key to attracting more young people to plumbing, heating and cooling apprenticeships and more businesses to support these apprenticeships lies in semantics. As Nørgaard said, “I myself have an education. It is not a ‘training’ as you often hear of in the United States.”
A great point. Training is for dogs, dancing bears and little kids who crap in their pants. Is that the way we think of the apprentices?
Maybe that’s the real problem.