Attaining proper flow rates through all parallel branches of a hydronic distribution system is a vital part of delivering the expected comfort. The usual intent of balancing is for the installer, or perhaps a separate testing-and-balancing contractor, to adjust several manually set balancing valves so that the flow rates in each branch of the system are at, or very close to, a listing of flow rates prescribed by the system designer. When these design flows are achieved, the system is considered to be properly balanced.
There are surely thousands of hydronic heating and cooling systems installed with manually set balancing valves. In most cases these are globe-type valves with precision shafts for precise movement of the plug relative to the seat. The shape of the plug in these valves is likely to give them an “equal percentage” characteristic.
Valves with equal percentage character-istics allow the relationship between the valve’s shaft movement and the heat output of the terminal unit through which it regulates flow to be approximately proportional. Thus, opening the valve’s shaft 50 percent of its total travel will yield approximately 50 percent heat output from the terminal unit, relative to its full heat output when the balancing valve is fully open.
This changes everythingOne nuance of manually set balancing valves, whether they are equal percentage or otherwise, is that a change in the flow rate in any branch of a multibranch system causes the flow rates in other branches to change. This happens because the differential pressure across the branches that remain open changes whenever another branch opens or closes.
A relatively new type of hydronic balancing valve has been developed to mitigate this undesirable effect. It is called a pressure-independent balancing valve (PIBV). These valves are configured to maintain a preset flow rate over a wide range of differential pressure. They rely on an internal compensating mechanism to adjust a specially tapered flow orifice within the valve so that a calibrated flow rate is maintained, typically within a tolerance of +/- 5 percent of the flow rating.
This cartridge gives a PIBV the ability to maintain a relatively stable flow rate over a wide range of differential pressure.Figure 3shows a cut-away view of the valve inFigure 2showing the internal cartridge assembly.
Each cartridge used in a PIBV is manufactured to maintain a specific flow rate. Manufacturers can change the internal cartridge within a given body to produce a range of various (fixed) flow rates (e.g., 2.0 gpm, 3.0 gpm, etc).
At low differential pressures (2 to 5 psi, depending on the specific valve make and model), the internal compensating mechanism of the cartridge does not move. This allows the maximum free-flow area through the valve. Flow passes through both the fixed- and variable-shaped orifices. However, at such low differential pressures, the cartridgecannotadjust to maintain fixed flow rates. Thus, flow rate through the valve increases if differential pressure across the valve increases. The “inactive” position of the internal cartridge is shown inFigure 4. Notice that the internal spring is fully extended.
This ability of the cartridge to hold its calibrated flow rate remains in effect until the differential pressure across the valve exceeds an upper threshold limit of 14 to 35 psi (depending on valve make and model). Such high differential pressure is relatively uncommon in most well-designed hydronic systems that include some means of differential pressure control.
If the differential pressure across the valvedoesexceed the upper pressure threshold, the piston and counterbalancing spring can no longer maintain the calibrated flow rate. The piston’s position completely blocks flow through the tapered orifice. All flow must now pass through the fixed orifice. This condition is shown inFigure 5. The result will be an increase in flow rate if differential pressure increases above the upper pressure threshold.
Stay on the lineThe flow rate vs. differential pressure characteristics of a given PIBV is shown in Figure 6. The desirable condition is to maintain the differential pressure across the valve between the lower and upper threshold values. For the valve represented inFigure 6, this would be between 2 and 32 psi as represented by the green vertical line. Operation in this differential pressure range allows the internal cartridge to remain active so that the valve can maintain its calibrated flow rate.
However, this desirable condition is contingent upon keeping the differential pressure across the PIBV between its lower and upper threshold values. This condition is vitally important to proper application of such valves, and will be discussed in next month’s Hydronics Workshop column.
Report Abusive Comment