search
cart
facebook instagram twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • NEWS
  • PRODUCTS
    • FEATURED PRODUCTS
  • CONTRACTORS
    • BATH & KITCHEN PRO
    • BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
    • HIGH EFFICIENCY HOMES
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • WATER TREATMENT
    • PMC COLUMNS
      • Dave Yates: Contractor’s Corner
      • John Siegenthaler: Hydronics Workshop
      • Kenny Chapman: The Blue Collar Coach
      • Matt Michel: Service Plumbing Pros
      • Scott Secor: Heating Perceptions
  • ENGINEERS
    • CONTINUING EDUCATION
    • DECARBONIZATION | ELECTRIFICATION
    • FIRE PROTECTION
    • GEOTHERMAL | SOLAR THERMAL
    • PIPING | PLUMBING | PVF
    • PME COLUMNS
      • Christoph Lohr: Strategic Plumbing Insights
      • David Dexter: Plumbing Talking Points
      • James Dipping: Engineer Viewpoints
      • John Seigenthaler: Renewable Heating Design
      • Lowell Manalo: Plumbing Essentials
      • Misty Guard: Guard on Compliance
  • RADIANT & HYDRONICS
    • RADIANT COMFORT REPORT
    • THE GLITCH & THE FIX
  • INSIGHTS
    • CODES
    • GREEN PLUMBING & MECHANICAL
    • PROJECT PROFILES
    • COLUMNS
      • Codes Corner
      • Natalie Forster: Editorial Opinion
      • Guest Editorial
  • MEDIA
    • EBOOKS
    • PODCASTS
    • VIDEOS
    • WEBINARS
  • RESOURCES
    • INDUSTRY CALENDAR
    • DIRECTORIES
    • PM BOOKSTORE
    • CE CENTER
    • MARKET RESEARCH
    • CLASSIFIEDS
  • EMAGAZINE
    • EMAGAZINE
    • ARCHIVE ISSUES
    • CONTACT
    • ADVERTISE
    • PME EMAGAZINE ARCHIVES
  • SIGN UP!

Warner Settles With County For $1.6 Million

By Katie Rotella
June 19, 2000
Warner agrees to pay $1.625 million over the next 10 years to Montgomery County ...

Tom Warner and the Washington, D.C.-based Warner companies have agreed to pay at least $1.625 million over the next 10 years to Montgomery County to settle a 1995 lawsuit, according to both parties.

Warner said he decided to settle with the county after steps were taken to involve his wife Barbara's company Utility Service Express (USE), which Tom manages, into the lawsuit.

"I did not want her to be subjected to what I had been through," Warner said. USE, started in May 1998, has become the Warners' only source of income. Legal fees mounted to $3 million during the ongoing lawsuits, and Tom filed for personal bankruptcy in July.

Though the county has not alleged that USE engaged in any deceptive and unfair trade practices, it will, for purpose of the settlement, be responsible for the payment of monies into the Consumer Restitution Fund for compensation to Warner consumers. The fund could be significantly higher than $1.625 million, since the county will receive a percentage of the gross revenues of USE.

Also in the settlement, the Warner companies have admitted to committing violations of the Montgomery County Consumer

Protection laws between 1993 and 1995, and must agree to operate under strict standards established by the county and provide consumers with more information about the prices it charges. Warner said as early as 1996, revisions to the companies' flat rate practices had been "adopted voluntarily."

In November 1995, the Warner companies were sued by the County Office of Consumer Affairs for alleged violations of Montgomery County's Consumer Protection laws. The investigation, headed by two private law firms on a contingency basis, was based on less than 50 complaints, according to Warner. At the time the lawsuit was filed, the Warner companies had 170 trucks on the road serving 50,000 customers.

A three-day investigative report on the Warner companies by CBS affiliate WUSA (Channel 9) aired in November 1995. An ex-employee of American Mechanical Systems of Baltimore Inc., which Warner owned separately from the Warner companies, submitted a manuscript full of undocumented and unproven allegations to WUSA. The employee never worked in the county, according to Warner.

Another television exposé of the Warner companies aired in February 1996 by CBS's "48 Hours," which filmed five different services firms fixing a disconnected terminal wire in a furnace. The Warner service technician attempted to replace a working motor that was statistically near the end of its useful life, and sold a service contract without fully explaining it. The bill resulted in a $6 overcharge, but it entitled the furnace owner to another check-up the following spring.

In December 1997, the Maryland Office of the Attorney General, Consumer Protection Division, also filed a suit against the Warner companies. It cited three unfair and deceptive trade practices, including the company's use of unlicensed journeymen. The WSSC code enforcement authority in the area did not require journeymen to be licensed, according to the Warner attorneys. That lawsuit has yet to be settled.

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Katie Rotella was the senior editor of Plumbing & Mechanical from 1999-2009.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • 2025 Next Gen ALL-STARS hero 1440

    2025 Next Gen All Stars: Top 20 Under 40 Plumbing Professionals

    This year’s group of NextGen All-Stars is full of young...
    Plumbing & Mechanical Contractor
    By: Kristen R. Bayles
  • Worker using the Milwaukee Tool SWITCH PACK drain cleaner

    Pipeline profits: Drain cleaning, pipe inspection create opportunities

    Drain cleaning and inspection services offer lucrative...
    Plumbing News
    By: Nicole Krawcke
  • Uponor employee, Arturo Moreno

    The reinvestment in American manufacturing and training

    Plumbing & Mechanical Chief Editor Nicole Krawcke and...
    Plumbing News
    By: Nicole Krawcke and Natalie Forster
Manage My Account
  • eNewsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • eMagazine
  • Manage My Preferences

More Videos

Popular Stories

Hot water pipes

Campus shutdown at Oakland University exposes hidden risks of aging hot-water infrastructure

Floor heating manifold cabinet with flowmeter and PEX pipe.

Elegance extended: How to use the homerun system of connecting heat emitters

Industrial pressure gauge on a tank.

From cutting edge to classic: How to modernize outdated pneumatic control systems

Poll

Will business be up or down in 2025?

Do you anticipate business in 2025 to be up or down in comparison to 2024?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

The Water Came To A Stop

The Water Came To A Stop

See More Products
eBook | 2025 Radiant & Hydronics All Stars

Related Articles

  • Convention Settles Little For PHCC

    See More
  • Warner Files For Bankruptcy

    See More
  • Goodyear Settles With Katzenberg

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • howcome.gif

    How Come? Hydronic heating questions we've been asking for 100 years (with straight answers!)

  • pocketfullsteamproblm.gif

    A Pocketful of Steam Problems (with solutions!)

  • cengagebook.jpg

    Heating with Renewable Energy

See More Products
×

Keep your content unclogged with our newsletters!

Stay in the know on the latest plumbing & piping industry trends.

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
    • Supply House Times
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing