Plumbing With Pex
by Steve Smith
May 2, 2007
Partusch
Plumbing takes the challenges of the Great White North in stride.
In Alaska, “tubing season” lasts just three summer
months when contractors are just as likely to spot fresh bear tracks at a
construction site as they are discarded building materials.
“We may lay down 20,000 or 30,000 feet of
radiant snowmelt tubing in those short months and another 150,000 feet of
interior tube,” says Larry Partusch,
president of Partusch Plumbing, Anchorage. “Many jobsites may have tubing in
long before we can get to the boiler installations, but our customers know the
realities of dealing with severe conditions and long, hard winters.”
His crews need to move fast through June,
July and August, particularly considering a lot of company business is in new
residential construction — and mostly large, custom homes for 25-30 key
homebuilders.
“Since that’s the time frame we have to get
it done in,” Partusch says, “we find a way through it.”
To get
through plumbing these homes, Partusch was the first plumbing contractor to use
a PEX plumbing manifold system in 1990. Seventeen years ago, contractors were
just beginning to learn about PEX, and then, primarily as a means to carry warm
water for radiant and snowmelt use.
For
Partusch, using a PEX plumbing system was a time-saver, and anything that saves
time also addresses the industry’s labor shortage. Partusch has just as much
trouble finding skilled plumbers as the rest of the “48ers.” The Viega manifold
system they use goes in relatively easily compared to metallic pipe. And the
flexible nature of PEX means one roll can uncoil to 1,000 continuous feet.
Compared to a traditional trunk-and-branch copper system, PEX can wiggle around
framing and mechanical obstructions, reducing the need for cutting and
fittings.
With less time spent on one job, Partusch
says his younger plumbers gain more experience learning other skills, such as
drainage and gas piping, which do require a bit more know-how.
Plumbing Use
 |
| Early in the morning, in the room they call the Think Tank, Terry Bolton, manager of Northern Sheet Metal; Mike Cooke, manager of plumbing operations; and Kevin McConnel, field superintendent for Partusch, make preparations for the coming day's activities. |
|
PEX for plumbing is a speedy alternative to rigid
pipe. Copper remains the most widely used material for water supply lines in
the United States, installed in 41 percent of new homes, according to an annual
building practices survey from 2005 by the National Association of Home
Builders’ Research Center.
But the survey also put the use of PEX for
plumbing at 19 percent for new homes, not bad for a product that has only seen
widespread use for plumbing in the last 10 years.
A majority
of our readers were installing PEX plumbing in a survey Plumbing &
Mechanical completed in
2003 — although it was a slim majority at 53 percent. In total plumbing
installations, readers said they used copper 51 percent of the time and PEX at
43 percent, followed by CPVC at 5 percent.
By 2009, 73 percent of our readers expected
to be installing more PEX plumbing systems.
Partusch’s abbreviated construction schedule
highlights the time savings most contractors say is their biggest reason to use
PEX for plumbing vs. metallic pipe. Fifty-five percent of our readers, for
example, said “quicker installation time” was the No. 1 advantage of PEX
plumbing.
For the homeowner, the PEX manifold systems
operate as a sort of command center for water use. “PEX hot and cold
distribution lines supply each side of each fixture with its own dedicated
water line,” says Mike Cooke, Partusch’s
manager of plumbing operations. “This helps to reduce water temperature and
pressure changes, even when several fixtures are used at the same time.”
The typical higher-end home Cooke will plumb
can be 7,000-8,000 square feet with four-and-a-half bathrooms and wet bar that
go for about $700,000-$900,000, not including the four- or five-acre lot.
“But they can go a lot bigger than that out
here; we see all sizes and shapes,” assures Cooke.
He adds that they also do “starter homes” in
the $250,000 range — what it costs in Anchorage for a 1,700-square-foot,
three-bedroom, two-bath home with no frills.
“But most of our homes are in the 2,500- to
4,500-square-foot range, and they’re almost exclusively — say, 99 percent of them — plumbed with PEX,” continues
Cooke. The only exception is when an owner insists on copper. “The plumbing and
mechanical recipe we’ve settled on is Viega PEX with one or two Maniblocs, a
Bradford White 50-gallon, 65,000 Btu water heater — or the larger eF — and
Grundfos hot water recircs, and SuperBrute or VersaFlo multi-speed pumps.”
Design Guide
 |
| PEX Design Guide from PATH |
|
The Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing
released a 128-page design guide for residential PEX plumbing systems last
November to further help the plumbing and construction industry understand the
alternative. The guide, prepared by the NAHB Research Center, compares three
common layouts and then provides sample designs for a ranch house, two-story
colonial, townhouse and condo. In order to quantify the differences between PEX
system designs, each system was tested under controlled settings in a laboratory.
Actual residential plumbing fixtures, piping layouts with fittings, and even
elevation changes were installed.
The guide details some of the following
features and advantages for each type of design:
Trunk and
branch
- Simple system design conversion
from rigid piping to flexible PEX
piping.
- Opportunities to reduce the number of
fittings installed.
-
T&B systems will deliver hot water
quicker during sequential flows.
- T&B systems
will generally supply one fixture at a higher pressure.
Homerun
- Easier piping runs to each fixture using smaller-diameter
piping.
- Opportunity to eliminate all fittings between the
manifold and the outlet.
- Opportunity to have centrally
located individual shut-offs housed at the manifold.
-
Quicker delivery of hot and cold water to the outlets.
- A
more stable pressure to each fixture when operating simultaneous
fixtures.
Remote
manifold
-
Relatively simple system design conversion from rigid piping to flexible PEX
piping.
- Opportunities to reduce the number of fittings
installed.
- Quicker hot water delivery during sequential
flows.
- Opportunity to have centrally located individual
shut-offs housed at the remote manifold.
Click on the following link to download the free PEX Design Guide: http://www.toolbase.org/Design-Construction-Guides/Plumbing/pex-design-guide.
More PEX
 |
| Brad Musgrave, apprentice boiler tech, and John Annesi, journeyman service plumber, prepare to load several water heaters onto trucks bound for jobsites all over the Anchorage area. |
|
As stated in the beginning of this article, Partusch
Plumbing also uses a lot of PEX for radiant and snowmelt. Military housing also
has been a real source of business over the last couple of years. These aren’t
exactly barracks. In this case, the military contracts with private developers
to build entire residential communities, which the military leases. The developments
include a good portion of the mechanical systems Partusch’s professionals install
and regularly service.
To keep up the pace, the company has figured
other ways to save time besides installing PEX plumbing. For example, Partusch
and business colleague Terry
Bolton constructed a 13,000-square-foot building, with
10,000 square feet of additional snowmelt outside, in 1995.
“When the building was being designed, at
the top of the list was the need for room — lots of it — for inventory,” Bolton
says. “We wanted to be able to stash lots of inventory to reduce the need for
installers to be at the wholesaler. Before, we lost a lot of time that way.”
As a
result of the space, the company figures it makes fewer trips to the wholesaler
than any other nearby firm.
The company also purchases its water
heaters, plumbing fixtures and fittings, and many other supplies “direct-to-door.”
“We buy
only through wholesale distribution, but they don’t need to handle the material
or write an inventory for every unit,” explains Rick Thompson, who handles all billing and bid solicitations.
“Instead, we’re invoiced for an entire truckload. This reduces the cost for the
manufacturer, the wholesaler and for us. This means that we can be more
competitive with shops that are buying all materials and supplies over the
counter.”
Within a
growing market, and with all this efficiency, Partusch says the company pays it
off at the most important level — where the employee stands. “If we don’t offer
employees the best work environment, the best salary, benefits and training,
and the commitment to their safety, then we lose,” he says.
Opportunity
is what made Partusch head north. He visited the Anchorage area as a young
plumber from Omaha, Neb., in 1980 at a time when construction in the Midwest
was in a downturn. Taking a gamble on a better future, he moved to Alaska and
opened shop as Partusch Plumbing in 1982.
Bolton
moved from Iowa to join him in 1987, and quickly headed up company subsidiary
Northern Sheetmetal. “Here, radiant is king,” Bolton says. “And what some may
think an oddity for Alaska homebuilding, air conditioning has become important,
too. Our warmer summers have changed this for Alaskans. Few homes are being
built today without considering it as an important option.”
In 1995
Cooke responded to Bolton’s insistence to join him (they’re cousins); the three
formed what would become the core management team.
The company offers vacation pay, paid
training time, medical, dental and retirement benefits with the company putting
in 15 percent of gross wages, placed into individual SEP accounts.
“People tend to stay here,” Bolton
adds. “Some have wandered out, but then
quickly return.”
Protecting With PEX
 |
| The residential fire
sprinkler market has been the next big thing since the NFPA adopted its 13D standard on so-called multipurpose systems in 1980. |
|
An upcoming vote
toward the end of this month could give a huge boost to an essentially new
market for plumbers – fire sprinkler systems for new residential construction.
The International Code Council will take a
vote sometime between May 21-26 on whether to change its International
Residential Code to make fire sprinklers mandatory for one- and two-family
dwellings, as well as townhouses. The IRC governs most of this country’s
residential construction and is currently in use by jurisdictions in 45 states
and the District of Columbia.
If accepted this month, the fire sprinkler
requirement would become part of the 2009 edition of the IRC.
The residential fire sprinkler market has
been the next big thing since the National Fire Protection Association adopted
its 13D standard on so-called multipurpose systems in 1980. Up to this point,
about 200 municipalities throughout the United States require fire sprinklers
for new residential construction. With a million or so new housing starts added
annually to the 100 million existing homes, not surprisingly, only about 2 percent
of the country’s homes have fire sprinklers.
Residential sprinklers can be installed as a
standalone system — piping dedicated to only supplying water to sprinklers. In
some ways, this is much like a down-sized commercial system for the home.
However, a multipurpose system integrates
the fire sprinkler system with a home’s cold-water piping. In other words, the
cold water that flows through a faucet is the same water that feeds the
sprinklers.
Proponents say one piping system to do the
work of two has obvious installation cost-savings right off the bat. And from a
marketing standpoint, plumbers stand a better chance of being the ones to
install such a hybrid since all homes have to be plumbed regardless.
The residential sprinkler system, be it
standalone or multipurpose, can be made of most any common plumbing piping
material, including copper and CPVC. In fact, CPVC dominates much of the
miniscule residential market today. Even steel pipe, the traditional choice for
commercial fire protection, can be used in residential although it is very
uncommon.
At this point, only two manufacturers, Rehau and Uponor, are marketing the
flexibility of PEX into a multipurpose system.
Regardless
of the ICC vote, some state and local jurisdictions have restrictive licensing
laws that may prevent the installation of a multipurpose system. As Julius Ballanco points out in a March article in sister
publication PMEngineer, some areas require that the plumbing contractor also be a licensed sprinkler
contractor.
|