Solar Heating From A Radiant Contractor’s Perspective
by Henry Gifford
December 20, 2009
 |
| Solar installations need not be complicated. (Photo credit: Rheem Mfg. Co.) |
|
Solar
thermal systems have plenty in common with traditional hydronic heating
systems.
As a heating contractor, you have probably
noticed that solar thermal systems
have some things in common with hydronic heating systems: pumps moving hot
water
through pipes, electronic controls and phone calls in the middle of the night
if it doesn’t work. This puts us in a good position to not only expand into
offering solar systems, but gives us potential advantages over solar-only
contractors.
I believe that solar thermal systems need to be simple. Years ago, when I first
started fixing up heating systems to save energy, I was proud of some of the
really sophisticated things I did. But when I came back later and saw my
masterpieces disconnected or not working because nobody understood or took care
of them, I learned the hard way that unless I stick to things that are very
simple, I wasn’t saving anyone any energy.
For solar thermal, the level of system complication depends mostly on three
questions:
1. How big will the system be — small, medium or large?
2. Will the system heat domestic water only or also heat the
building?
3. How will the system be protected from freezing in the winter?
System Sizing
A large system heats all the domestic hot water plus
meets some of the building’s heating needs. It is the most complicated because
it needs fancy controls to sometimes heat domestic water and sometimes provide
heat, all without ever overheating anything or allowing a back-up heater or
boiler to heat the sky.
Because the large system meets so much of the load, it has the highest “solar
fraction,” which is what solar-only contractors often focus on: the percentage
of the overall energy load that the system can meet. A higher solar fraction,
however, can mean the worst economics.
The large system has enough capacity to make heat in the winter, but much of
its capacity goes unused the rest of the year. All summer, much of the
equipment just sits there producing nothing but loan payments. It might take
the longest time to pay for itself.
A medium system is large enough to heat all the domestic hot water without any
back-up system, even under special circumstances, such as several overnight
guests during a cloudy week. So it, too, will have a lot of capacity that costs
money to buy but goes unused much of the time.
A small system has the capacity to meet some, but not all, domestic hot water
needs on an average summer day. That means during the rest of the year, when
there is less sun and the panels are surrounded by colder air, it needs help
from a backup source of heat, such as a conventional water heater or
boiler.
Since all of its capacity is used most days, however, there is no capacity that
goes unused for long, which makes the payback better than for medium or large
systems.
Once the size question is answered, the question about making just hot water
vs. hot water and heat goes away: just heat some of the hot water. This can
make selling the job a little tougher. But the economic reality is that a
homeowner can save the most energy for the least money by installing the small
system or buying a sealed combustion boiler, new windows, better insulation,
etc.
Freeze Protection
The next question is how to protect the outdoor
components of the system from freezing. One popular approach is to add glycol
antifreeze to the system. Unfortunately, glycol is a carbohydrate, which
bacteria can eat and produce an acidic byproduct which corrodes copper. And
high temperatures can cook it into a sugar-like substance, which coats the
critical heat-exchange surfaces of a solar thermal system, causing performance
to drop off.
Overheating can damage glycol during an electricity blackout or equipment
failure, which prevents the system from removing heat from the panels. Even
when the system is working perfectly, it still needs to remove enough heat to
prevent damage to the glycol.
What do you do with the heat when the storage tank is already hot? A common
approach is a “dump load heat exchanger,” such as a radiator mounted outdoors,
sometimes with a fan. If the fan fails or the pump doesn’t work when it should,
the panels will overheat and cook the glycol.
If glycol is starting to sound complicated, consider that it also needs to be
kept at a safe distance from drinking water, stored somewhere when the system
is drained for maintenance, checked periodically to make sure it is still
providing freeze protection, replaced every so many years and, eventually,
disposed of in a safe manner.
My favorite freeze protection is a drainback system, which lets the water drain
back from the panels whenever the system is not operating. This protects the
outdoor components of the system from freezing without glycol or a dump load
heat exchanger.
The Tank-And-A-Half
If successful solar installation was as easy as
choosing drainback and simplifying the system by choosing the small size, there
must be a reason why solar-only contractors often choose much more complicated
systems. I think the answer is that from their perspective, with solar as their
only product, they have every reason to put in the system that will capture as
much energy as possible. This is understandable, as is another trend common to
solar-only contractors: leaving all existing water heating equipment
intact.
As plumbing and heating contractors, we’re already responsible for providing
uninterrupted heat and hot water, so we don’t need to limit ourselves to add-on
solar systems. Instead, we can design and install systems that make the most
sense overall, with the solar and conventional parts working
together.
To keep things separate, solar-only contractors often add a solar-heated water
tank in series with the existing water heater. They go to a lot of trouble to
get the solar tank to handle the standby losses from the water heater, which
can involve three-way valves, pumped loops and other complications. Or worse,
some systems attempt to simply add heat to the existing water heater, which
means either overheating the water and possibly scalding people or severely
limiting the amount of heat the solar system can add.
Instead of choosing between one tank or two, we can install a tank with one
heating coil near the top, heated by a back-up source such as a boiler, and a
second coil near the bottom, which the solar thermal system uses to heat the
bottom half of the tank.
Convection moves hot water from the bottom of the tank to the top whenever
appropriate, which handles standby losses. When someone showers at night, the
conventional heat source only heats half the tank, leaving the cold water in
the bottom of the tank ready to be heated by the solar
system.
Because this type of tank works so well for solar thermal, it should be
seriously considered instead of a conventional indirect water heater.
More Affordable
We have other ways to make solar systems less
expensive. The next time we have walls open to work on a bathroom, kitchen or
heating system, we can run extra pipe that can be used for a future solar
thermal system. Not only do these preparations save the owner money,
but guess who the owner will call when it is time to install a solar
system?
I believe it should be standard practice to install a real energy meter on each
system and use it to measure actual production. Some solar controllers do
measure temperature difference between the pipes to and from the panels, and
multiply that difference by a flow that is assumed based on the pump operating
hours.
However, I have seen that type of “meter” recording energy gain while the
system was airbound and doing nothing but wasting electricity operating the pump.
Real meters that measure actual water flow and temperature difference are what
we need to use.
With building energy use perhaps the largest field of human endeavor in which
almost nobody measures anything, it is important that we start measuring how
much energy solar
systems capture and use that information to learn what really works. At the
same time, we can show our customers real, measured savings that endure year
after year, with realistic payback periods.
|